The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles as a proposed new epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and risks obscuring the uneven responsibilities of different societies. They suggest that a more nuanced framework, such as 'capitalocene', better captures the role of economic systems. This debate is not merely semantic; it influences policy priorities and public perception of environmental crises. Ultimately, the choice of terminology shapes how we understand humanity's role in shaping planetary futures.
❓ 本文によると、「人新世」という用語の批判者たちは、それが以下の点を主張している。
A. A) 環境変化における経済システムの役割を過度に強調している
B. B) 異なる社会の不均等な貢献を考慮に入れていない
C. C) 環境問題に対する一般の理解には複雑すぎる
D. D) 新たな地質時代に関する科学的証拠を無視している
✅ 正确答案
B) fails to account for the uneven contributions of different societies
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first