The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles as a proposed new epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and risks obscuring the uneven responsibilities of different societies. They suggest that a more nuanced framework, such as 'capitalocene', better captures the role of economic systems. This debate is not merely semantic; it influences policy priorities and public perception of environmental crises. Ultimately, the choice of terminology shapes how we understand humanity's role in shaping planetary futures.
❓ 지문에 따르면, '인류세'라는 용어에 대한 비판자들은 그것이 다음과 같다고 주장한다:
A. A) 경제 체제가 환경 변화에 미치는 역할을 과도하게 강조한다
B. B) 다양한 사회들의 상이한 기여도를 설명하지 못한다
C. C) 환경 문제에 대한 대중의 이해에는 너무 복잡하다
D. D) 인류세라는 새로운 지질 시대에 대한 과학적 증거를 무시한다
✅ 正确答案
B) fails to account for the uneven contributions of different societies
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first