The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a measure of an individual's ability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills, CQ encompasses four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices across cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to adapt, and behavioral CQ pertains to the capability to exhibit appropriate verbal and non-verbal actions. Recent studies suggest that high CQ correlates with better job performance in multinational teams, yet critics argue that existing assessments rely heavily on self-reporting, which may not accurately predict real-world adaptability. Consequently, researchers advocate for integrating situational judgment tests to enhance predictive validity.
❓ 根据文章所述,当前文化智商(CQ)评估的主要局限性是什么?
A. 他们过分强调行为层面,而忽视了认知层面。
B. 他们依赖于可能缺乏预测准确性的自我报告测量方法。
C. 他们忽视了文化智力的动机维度。
D. 它们仅适用于跨国企业环境。
✅ 正确答案
They depend on self-reported measures that may lack predictive accuracy.