The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a measure of an individual's ability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills, CQ encompasses four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices across cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to adapt, and behavioral CQ pertains to the capability to exhibit appropriate verbal and non-verbal actions. Recent studies suggest that high CQ correlates with better job performance in multinational teams, yet critics argue that existing assessments rely heavily on self-reporting, which may not accurately predict real-world adaptability. Consequently, researchers advocate for integrating situational judgment tests to enhance predictive validity.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 현재 문화지능(CQ) 평가의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. 그들은 인지적 측면보다 행동적 측면을 지나치게 강조한다.
B. 그들은 예측 정확성이 부족할 수 있는 자기 보고식 측정에 의존한다.
C. 그들은 문화적 지능의 동기 부여 차원을 무시한다.
D. 그들은 다국적 기업 환경에만 적용 가능합니다.
✅ 正确答案
They depend on self-reported measures that may lack predictive accuracy.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first