第429篇 楚王将出张子(二)

出处:战国策·楚策二

语言: 中文 English Español 日本語 한국어 Tiếng Việt ไทย Русский

📜 原文(文言文)

楚王将出张子,恐其败己也,乃谓左右曰:“张子之来,吾欲辱之,以显吾国。”左右皆曰:“善。”张子闻之,谓其舍人曰:“吾闻楚王欲辱我,吾当以计免。”乃先见楚王曰:“臣闻大王欲辱臣,臣请死。”楚王曰:“何也?”张子曰:“臣闻大王以臣为败楚,故欲辱臣。臣请效死,以明臣不欺大王。”楚王曰:“子毋然,吾与子戏耳。”张子曰:“臣闻之,忠臣不避死,以成君之名。今大王欲辱臣,臣死且不辞,何辱之惧?然臣有计,可使楚无东顾之忧,而大王享其利,愿大王听之。”楚王曰:“子之言何如?”张子曰:“大王诚能用臣之计,则请令韩、魏致地,而齐、赵效贡,燕、代皆来朝,则楚可以霸矣。”楚王曰:“善。吾请子为相。”张子曰:“臣不敢当,请归相秦。”楚王遂厚礼而归之。

📖 白话文翻译

King Huai of Chu was about to let Zhang Yi return to the State of Qin, yet he harbored misgivings that Zhang Yi might, upon his return, devise schemes detrimental to Chu. He thus addressed his courtiers, saying, “Now that Zhang Yi has come, I intend to humiliate him, so as to display the might of our Chu.” The courtiers all voiced their assent. When Zhang Yi learned of this, he said to his retainers, “I have heard that the King of Chu wishes to humiliate me. I must devise a means to avert this.” Thereupon he went first to see the King and said, “I have heard that Your Majesty intends to humiliate me. I beg that Your Majesty allow me to die.” The King asked, “Why is this?” Zhang Yi replied, “I have heard that Your Majesty believes I have wronged Chu and therefore wishes to disgrace me. I beg to die to prove that I have not deceived Your Majesty.” The King said, “Do not do thus; I was merely jesting with you.” Zhang Yi responded, “I have heard that a loyal minister does not fear death, but rather uses it to perfect his sovereign’s renown. Now, if Your Majesty wishes to humiliate me, and I do not even fear death, what shame could I dread? Yet I have a plan that could rid Chu of all anxiety to the east, while Your Majesty reaps the benefits. I hope Your Majesty will deign to hear it.” The King asked, “What plan do you have?” Zhang Yi said, “If Your Majesty truly adopts my strategy, I can cause Han and Wei to offer their territories, Qi and Zhao to present tribute, and Yan and Dai to come to court—thus Chu may attain hegemony.” The King said, “Excellent. I shall appoint you as Chancellor of Chu.” Zhang Yi replied, “I dare not accept such honor; allow me to return to Qin and serve as Chancellor there.” The King of Chu then bestowed upon him lavish gifts and sent him back to Qin.

💡 商战启示录

When Zhang Yi faced the hostility and the scheme to humiliate him devised by the King of Chu, he did not meet the conflict head-on or offer direct self-justification. Instead, he first retreated in order to advance—voluntarily offering his own life—thereby defusing the other party's aggressive intent. He then presented an even greater lure of benefit (the grand blueprint of hegemony), transforming crisis into opportunity. This reveals a core strategy in business negotiation: when the counterparty harbors hostility or holds preconceived positions, direct rebuttal often intensifies the conflict. By first acknowledging or accommodating the other party's emotions—such as admitting fault or displaying vulnerability—and then shifting the focus to shared interests or a larger vision, one can effectively dissolve confrontation. In modern business, for instance, during merger and acquisition negotiations, when the other side resists cooperation due to historical grievances or market conflicts, an experienced CEO will first acknowledge possible misunderstandings on their own part ("We understand your concerns"), and then propose post-integration market synergies or technology sharing, redirecting the conversation from "who was right or wrong in the past" to "how we can achieve mutual success in the future." Similarly, in the patent litigation between Apple and Samsung, although the two parties clashed fiercely in court, Apple nonetheless emphasized the value of supply-chain cooperation in private negotiations, avoiding a complete rupture. Zhang Yi's wisdom lies in not clinging to the immediate outcome of victory or defeat, but in using a higher-dimensional interest to redefine the relationship. The lesson for modern business is this: when faced with hostility, the most brilliant response is neither defense nor counterattack, but rather redefining the agenda—offering a larger "pie" that the other party cannot refuse, ultimately achieving win-win results or securing a position of dominance.