The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding cross-cultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal regulation, CQ specifically targets the capability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Research distinguishes four dimensions: metacognitive CQ (awareness of cultural assumptions), cognitive CQ (knowledge of norms and practices), motivational CQ (interest and confidence in cross-cultural interactions), and behavioral CQ (ability to adapt verbal and non-verbal actions). Studies suggest that motivational CQ acts as a catalyst, enhancing the other dimensions by driving individuals to engage deeply with unfamiliar cultural contexts. However, critics argue that CQ measurements often rely on self-report, which may not accurately predict actual performance. They advocate for more objective assessments, such as situational judgment tests, to validate the construct's utility in global talent management.
❓ 본문에서 언급된 문화적 지능에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 문화 간 상황에서 감성 지능의 역할을 무시한다.
B. 자기 보고식 측정에 의존하기 때문에 실제 세계의 행동을 정확히 예측하지 못할 수 있다.
C. 그것은 인지적 이해를 희생하면서 행동 적응을 지나치게 강조한다.
D. 네 가지 차원에 대한 명확한 이론적 프레임워크가 부족하다.
✅ 正确答案
It relies on self-report measures that may not predict real-world behavior accurately.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first