The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental discourse, positing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature, warranting a new geological epoch. However, critics contend that the term conflates geological time with historical time, and that the proposed markers are diachronous, appearing at different times across the globe. They suggest that formalizing the Anthropocene may obscure the uneven responsibility for environmental change, as industrial nations have contributed disproportionately to emissions compared to developing regions. Thus, the debate extends beyond scientific classification, touching upon geopolitical and ethical dimensions of environmental governance.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세에 관한 주요 논쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. 그것의 층서학적 지표들은 지질학적으로 간주되기에는 너무 최근의 것이다.
B. 국가별 환경 변화에 대한 불평등한 기여도를 간과할 수 있다.
C. 모든 지질학자들로부터 증거 부족으로 인해 거부되었습니다.
D. 과학적 데이터보다 윤리적 문제에 너무 초점을 맞추고 있다.
✅ 正确答案
Its stratigraphic markers are diachronous and the term may obscure uneven responsibility for environmental change.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first