The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding cross-cultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal regulation, CQ specifically targets the capability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Research distinguishes four dimensions: metacognitive CQ (awareness of cultural assumptions), cognitive CQ (knowledge of norms and practices), motivational CQ (interest and confidence in cross-cultural interactions), and behavioral CQ (ability to adapt verbal and non-verbal actions). Studies suggest that motivational CQ acts as a catalyst, enhancing the other dimensions by driving individuals to engage deeply with unfamiliar cultural contexts. However, critics argue that CQ measurements often rely on self-report, which may not accurately predict actual performance. They advocate for more objective assessments, such as situational judgment tests, to validate the construct's utility in global talent management.
❓ この文章で言及されている文化的知性に対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. それは、異文化環境における感情的知性の役割を無視している。
B. 自己報告式の測定に依存しており、実際の行動を正確に予測できない可能性がある。
C. それは認知的理解を犠牲にして行動的適応を過度に強調している。
D. 4つの側面に対する明確な理論的枠組みが欠けている。
✅ 正确答案
It relies on self-report measures that may not predict real-world behavior accurately.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first