The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the late 20th century, primarily from grassroots movements in the United States that highlighted the disproportionate burden of pollution borne by low-income communities and minorities. Scholars have since expanded the term to encompass global disparities, where developing nations often experience the harshest effects of climate change despite contributing least to greenhouse gas emissions. This paradox raises critical questions about equity and responsibility. While some argue for a principle of 'common but differentiated responsibilities,' others contend that market-based mechanisms, such as carbon trading, can effectively address these imbalances without stifling economic growth. However, critics point out that such mechanisms may prioritize efficiency over fairness, potentially perpetuating existing inequalities. Ultimately, achieving environmental justice requires a nuanced balance between ecological sustainability, economic development, and social equity, a challenge that demands interdisciplinary approaches and international cooperation.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 탄소 거래와 같은 시장 기반 메커니즘에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 개발도상국들이 이를 시행하기에는 너무 비용이 많이 든다.
B. 그들은 공정성을 희생하면서 효율성에 집중할 수 있다.
C. 그들은 온실가스 배출을 효과적으로 줄이는 데 실패하고 있다.
D. 그들은 정책 결정에 있어 풀뿌리 운동의 역할을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
They may focus on efficiency at the expense of fairness.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first