The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the late 20th century, primarily from grassroots movements in the United States that highlighted the disproportionate burden of pollution borne by low-income communities and minorities. Scholars have since expanded the term to encompass global disparities, where developing nations often experience the harshest effects of climate change despite contributing least to greenhouse gas emissions. This paradox raises critical questions about equity and responsibility. While some argue for a principle of 'common but differentiated responsibilities,' others contend that market-based mechanisms, such as carbon trading, can effectively address these imbalances without stifling economic growth. However, critics point out that such mechanisms may prioritize efficiency over fairness, potentially perpetuating existing inequalities. Ultimately, achieving environmental justice requires a nuanced balance between ecological sustainability, economic development, and social equity, a challenge that demands interdisciplinary approaches and international cooperation.
❓ 根据文章内容,对碳交易等市场机制的主要批评是什么?
A. 这些技术对于发展中国家来说实施成本过高。
B. 他们可能会为了效率而牺牲公平。
C. 他们未能有效减少温室气体排放。
D. 他们忽视了基层运动在政策制定中的作用。
✅ 正确答案
They may focus on efficiency at the expense of fairness.