The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the late 20th century, primarily from grassroots movements in the United States that highlighted the disproportionate burden of pollution borne by low-income communities and minorities. Scholars have since expanded the term to encompass global disparities, where developing nations often experience the harshest effects of climate change despite contributing least to greenhouse gas emissions. This paradox raises critical questions about equity and responsibility. While some argue for a principle of 'common but differentiated responsibilities,' others contend that market-based mechanisms, such as carbon trading, can effectively address these imbalances without stifling economic growth. However, critics point out that such mechanisms may prioritize efficiency over fairness, potentially perpetuating existing inequalities. Ultimately, achieving environmental justice requires a nuanced balance between ecological sustainability, economic development, and social equity, a challenge that demands interdisciplinary approaches and international cooperation.
❓ Theo đoạn văn, một chỉ trích lớn đối với các cơ chế dựa trên thị trường như giao dịch carbon là gì?
A. Chúng quá đắt đỏ để các nước đang phát triển có thể triển khai.
B. Họ có thể tập trung vào hiệu quả mà bỏ qua sự công bằng.
C. Họ không giảm được lượng khí thải gây hiệu ứng nhà kính một cách hiệu quả.
D. Họ bỏ qua vai trò của các phong trào quần chúng trong việc hoạch định chính sách.
✅ 正确答案
They may focus on efficiency at the expense of fairness.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first