The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are distinct enough to demarcate this era from the Holocene. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that geological time scales typically rely on natural, not anthropogenic, signals. They also point to the difficulty in establishing a precise global boundary stratum, as human effects vary widely across regions. Despite this debate, the term has catalyzed interdisciplinary research, prompting scholars to reconsider humanity's role as a planetary force and the long-term consequences of industrial activity.
❓ Theo đoạn văn, lý do chính khiến một số nhà phê bình bác bỏ 'Anthropocene' như một kỷ địa chất chính thức là gì?
A. Các dấu hiệu đề xuất không đủ bền lâu.
B. Nó dựa vào các tín hiệu do con người tạo ra thay vì các tín hiệu tự nhiên.
C. Hoạt động công nghiệp không ảnh hưởng đồng đều đến tất cả các khu vực.
D. Thuật ngữ này chưa nhận được sự ủng hộ từ các nhà khoa học môi trường.
✅ 正确答案
It relies on human-induced signals rather than natural ones.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first