The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are distinct enough to demarcate this era from the Holocene. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that geological time scales typically rely on natural, not anthropogenic, signals. They also point to the difficulty in establishing a precise global boundary stratum, as human effects vary widely across regions. Despite this debate, the term has catalyzed interdisciplinary research, prompting scholars to reconsider humanity's role as a planetary force and the long-term consequences of industrial activity.
❓ 本文によると、一部の批評家が「人新世」を正式な地質時代として拒否する主な理由は何か。
A. 提案されたマーカーは、十分に長持ちしません。
B. それは自然の信号ではなく、人為的な信号に依存している。
C. 産業活動はすべての地域に均等に影響を及ぼしたわけではない。
D. この用語は環境科学者の間で支持を得ていない。
✅ 正确答案
It relies on human-induced signals rather than natural ones.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first