The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are distinct enough to demarcate this era from the Holocene. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that geological time scales typically rely on natural, not anthropogenic, signals. They also point to the difficulty in establishing a precise global boundary stratum, as human effects vary widely across regions. Despite this debate, the term has catalyzed interdisciplinary research, prompting scholars to reconsider humanity's role as a planetary force and the long-term consequences of industrial activity.
❓ 根据这篇文章,一些批评者拒绝将“人类世”作为正式地质纪元的主要原因是什么?
A. 所提议的标记物持久性不足。
B. 它依赖于人为信号,而非自然信号。
C. 工业活动对各地区的影响并不均衡。
D. 该术语尚未获得环境科学家的支持。
✅ 正确答案
It relies on human-induced signals rather than natural ones.