The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are distinct enough to demarcate this era from the Holocene. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, noting that geological time scales typically rely on natural, not anthropogenic, signals. They also point to the difficulty in establishing a precise global boundary stratum, as human effects vary widely across regions. Despite this debate, the term has catalyzed interdisciplinary research, prompting scholars to reconsider humanity's role as a planetary force and the long-term consequences of industrial activity.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 일부 비평가들이 '인류세'를 공식적인 지질 시대 단위로 거부하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. 제안된 마커는 충분히 오래 지속되지 않습니다.
B. 그것은 자연적 신호보다는 인간이 유발한 신호에 의존한다.
C. 산업 활동이 모든 지역에 동일하게 영향을 미친 것은 아니다.
D. 이 용어는 환경 과학자들 사이에서 지지를 얻지 못했습니다.
✅ 正确答案
It relies on human-induced signals rather than natural ones.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first