The concept of 'neurodiversity' has gained traction in recent years, challenging the traditional medical model that pathologizes conditions such as autism and ADHD. Proponents argue that these neurological variations are natural human differences, not disorders, and should be accommodated rather than cured. This perspective emphasizes the unique strengths that neurodivergent individuals bring, such as enhanced pattern recognition or creative problem-solving. However, critics caution that romanticizing neurodiversity may downplay the real challenges faced by those with severe impairments, who may require significant support. A balanced approach, they suggest, involves recognizing both the value of cognitive diversity and the need for targeted interventions to improve quality of life. This debate reflects broader questions about how society defines normalcy and allocates resources for inclusion.
❓ この文章によると、神経多様性運動の批評家たちが提起する主な懸念は何ですか?
A. A) それは神経学的疾患の過剰診断につながる可能性がある。
B. B) それは、一部の個人が経験する深刻な困難を見落とす可能性がある。
C. C) 神経多様性のある人々の創造的な強みを認識できていない。
D. D) 障害の医学モデルに過度に依存している。
✅ 正确答案
B) It might overlook the serious difficulties experienced by some individuals.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first