The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are stratigraphically distinct, warranting formal recognition. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and that formalizing it may obscure the uneven responsibilities of different societies for planetary change. Moreover, some scholars suggest that focusing solely on geological markers detracts from pressing policy discussions about sustainability and climate justice. Thus, while the Anthropocene serves as a powerful heuristic for understanding human influence, its formal adoption remains contentious, reflecting broader debates about scientific classification and societal values.