The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are stratigraphically distinct, warranting formal recognition. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and that formalizing it may obscure the uneven responsibilities of different societies for planetary change. Moreover, some scholars suggest that focusing solely on geological markers detracts from pressing policy discussions about sustainability and climate justice. Thus, while the Anthropocene serves as a powerful heuristic for understanding human influence, its formal adoption remains contentious, reflecting broader debates about scientific classification and societal values.
❓ 一部の学者が人新世を地質時代として正式に定めることに反対する主な理由は何ですか？
A. A. それは、人間活動が環境に与えるプラスの影響を考慮に入れていない。
B. B. それは複雑な相互作用を単純化し、重要な政策課題から焦点をそらす可能性がある。
C. C. 人間の影響に関する地質学的証拠は、まだ科学的に証明されていない。
D. D. それは環境管理において先進国に過大な評価を与えている。
✅ 正确答案
B. It simplifies complex interactions and may shift focus away from important policy issues.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first