The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are stratigraphically distinct, warranting formal recognition. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and that formalizing it may obscure the uneven responsibilities of different societies for planetary change. Moreover, some scholars suggest that focusing solely on geological markers detracts from pressing policy discussions about sustainability and climate justice. Thus, while the Anthropocene serves as a powerful heuristic for understanding human influence, its formal adoption remains contentious, reflecting broader debates about scientific classification and societal values.
❓ 일부 학자들이 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식화하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 인간 활동이 환경에 미치는 긍정적인 영향을 설명하지 못한다.
B. B. 이는 복잡한 상호작용을 단순화하고 중요한 정책 문제에서 초점을 벗어나게 할 수 있다.
C. C. 인간의 영향에 대한 지질학적 증거는 아직 과학적으로 입증되지 않았다.
D. D. 개발도상국이 아닌 선진국에 환경 관리에 대한 과도한 공로를 부여한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It simplifies complex interactions and may shift focus away from important policy issues.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first