The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has been a cornerstone of industrial design since the 1920s, when manufacturers deliberately shortened product lifecycles to stimulate consumer demand. However, recent research in sustainable economics challenges this paradigm, arguing that such strategies not only deplete natural resources but also undermine long-term market stability. A 2021 study by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation found that extending product durability by just 10% could reduce waste by 30% and create new business models based on repair and refurbishment. Critics of this shift contend that slower replacement cycles may dampen innovation and job growth in manufacturing sectors. Nevertheless, proponents highlight examples like the European Union's 'Right to Repair' legislation, which mandates spare part availability for up to ten years, as evidence that regulatory frameworks can align economic incentives with environmental goals. The debate ultimately hinges on whether consumer societies can redefine progress from quantity of goods to quality of utility.
❓ 본문에서 제시된 주요 주장은 무엇인가?
A. A. 계획적 노후화는 경제 성장과 혁신에 필수적이다.
B. B. 제품 수명 주기를 연장하는 것은 제조업 일자리와 혁신에 해를 끼칠 수 있다.
C. C. 지속 가능한 경제학은 잠재적인 단점에도 불구하고 제품의 더 긴 내구성을 옹호한다.
D. D. EU의 '수리할 권리' 법안은 폐기물 감축에 효과가 없는 것으로 드러났다.
✅ 正确答案
C. Sustainable economics advocates for longer product durability despite possible drawbacks.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first