The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding why some individuals adapt more effectively to multicultural environments. Unlike general cognitive ability, CQ encompasses four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices across cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to engage with cultural differences, and behavioral CQ pertains to the flexibility of verbal and non-verbal actions. Research indicates that CQ predicts cross-cultural adjustment beyond emotional intelligence and personality traits, particularly in expatriate assignments. However, critics argue that the construct overlaps with existing measures of openness to experience, questioning its incremental validity. Nevertheless, CQ training programs have been shown to enhance intercultural negotiation outcomes, suggesting practical utility. This academic debate underscores the complexity of measuring intercultural competence in a globalized workforce.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 문화적 지능(CQ)이 하나의 구성개념으로서 갖는 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 훈련 프로그램에서 실질적인 적용이 부족하다.
B. 개방성과 같은 기존 특성 이상의 독특한 예측 가치를 추가하지 않을 수 있습니다.
C. 행동적 측면에 지나치게 초점을 맞추고 인지 과정을 무시한다.
D. 해외 파견 근무에만 해당되며, 국내 상황에는 적용되지 않습니다.
✅ 正确答案
It may not add unique predictive value beyond established traits like openness.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first