The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has been a cornerstone of industrial design since the 1920s, when manufacturers deliberately shortened product lifecycles to stimulate consumer demand. However, recent research in sustainable economics challenges this paradigm, arguing that such strategies not only deplete natural resources but also undermine long-term market stability. A 2021 study by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation found that extending product durability by just 10% could reduce waste by 30% and create new business models based on repair and refurbishment. Critics of this shift contend that slower replacement cycles may dampen innovation and job growth in manufacturing sectors. Nevertheless, proponents highlight examples like the European Union's 'Right to Repair' legislation, which mandates spare part availability for up to ten years, as evidence that regulatory frameworks can align economic incentives with environmental goals. The debate ultimately hinges on whether consumer societies can redefine progress from quantity of goods to quality of utility.
❓ 这段文字的主要论点是什么?
A. A. 计划性淘汰对经济增长和创新至关重要。
B. B. 延长产品生命周期可能会损害制造业就业和创新。
C. C. 可持续经济学倡导延长产品耐用性,尽管这可能带来一些弊端。
D. D. 欧盟的“维修权”法律在减少浪费方面已被证明无效。
✅ 正确答案
C. Sustainable economics advocates for longer product durability despite possible drawbacks.