The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has been a cornerstone of industrial design since the 1920s, when manufacturers deliberately shortened product lifecycles to stimulate consumer demand. However, recent research in sustainable economics challenges this paradigm, arguing that such strategies not only deplete natural resources but also undermine long-term market stability. A 2021 study by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation found that extending product durability by just 10% could reduce waste by 30% and create new business models based on repair and refurbishment. Critics of this shift contend that slower replacement cycles may dampen innovation and job growth in manufacturing sectors. Nevertheless, proponents highlight examples like the European Union's 'Right to Repair' legislation, which mandates spare part availability for up to ten years, as evidence that regulatory frameworks can align economic incentives with environmental goals. The debate ultimately hinges on whether consumer societies can redefine progress from quantity of goods to quality of utility.
❓ この文章で提示されている主な主張は何ですか?
A. A. 計画的陳腐化は経済成長と革新にとって不可欠である。
B. B. 製品ライフサイクルの延長は、製造業の雇用やイノベーションに悪影響を及ぼす可能性がある。
C. C. 持続可能な経済学は、潜在的な欠点があるにもかかわらず、製品の耐久性の長期化を提唱している。
D. D. EUの「修理する権利」法は、廃棄物削減において効果がないことが証明されている。
✅ 正确答案
C. Sustainable economics advocates for longer product durability despite possible drawbacks.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first