The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding why some individuals adapt more effectively to multicultural environments. Unlike general cognitive ability, CQ encompasses four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices across cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to engage with cultural differences, and behavioral CQ pertains to the flexibility of verbal and non-verbal actions. Research indicates that CQ predicts cross-cultural adjustment beyond emotional intelligence and personality traits, particularly in expatriate assignments. However, critics argue that the construct overlaps with existing measures of openness to experience, questioning its incremental validity. Nevertheless, CQ training programs have been shown to enhance intercultural negotiation outcomes, suggesting practical utility. This academic debate underscores the complexity of measuring intercultural competence in a globalized workforce.
❓ この文章によると、文化的知性(CQ)という構成概念に対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. トレーニングプログラムにおける実用的な応用が欠けている。
B. 開放性などの確立された特性を超えて、独自の予測的価値を追加しない可能性があります。
C. 行動面に重点を置きすぎており、認知を無視している。
D. これは駐在員の赴任にのみ関連し、国内の状況には適用されません。
✅ 正确答案
It may not add unique predictive value beyond established traits like openness.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first