The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding why some individuals adapt more effectively to multicultural environments. Unlike general cognitive ability, CQ encompasses four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices across cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to engage with cultural differences, and behavioral CQ pertains to the flexibility of verbal and non-verbal actions. Research indicates that CQ predicts cross-cultural adjustment beyond emotional intelligence and personality traits, particularly in expatriate assignments. However, critics argue that the construct overlaps with existing measures of openness to experience, questioning its incremental validity. Nevertheless, CQ training programs have been shown to enhance intercultural negotiation outcomes, suggesting practical utility. This academic debate underscores the complexity of measuring intercultural competence in a globalized workforce.
❓ 根据这篇文章，文化智力（CQ）作为一个构念的主要批评是什么？
A. 它在培训项目中缺乏实际应用。
B. 它可能无法在开放性等既有特质之外提供独特的预测价值。
C. 它过于侧重行为层面，而忽视了认知过程。
D. 这仅与外派任务相关，不适用于国内环境。
✅ 正确答案
It may not add unique predictive value beyond established traits like openness.