The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a measure of an individual's ability to function effectively across diverse cultural contexts. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal regulation, CQ comprises four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices in different cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to adapt, and behavioral CQ denotes the capability to exhibit appropriate verbal and nonverbal actions. Research suggests that high CQ correlates with better job performance in multinational teams, yet critics argue that its measurement often relies on self-report scales, which may overestimate actual competence. Consequently, scholars advocate for integrating situational judgment tests to enhance predictive validity.
❓ 根据文章所述,当前文化智力(CQ)测量的一个主要局限是什么?
A. 它忽视了文化智能的行为维度。
B. 它依赖于自我报告量表,而这些量表可能无法准确反映真实能力。
C. 它过于侧重认知知识,而非动机。
D. 仅适用于跨国团队,不适用于国内环境。
✅ 正确答案
It relies on self-report scales that may not accurately reflect real ability.