The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has long been a cornerstone of consumer electronics manufacturing, yet its environmental ramifications are increasingly under scrutiny. While manufacturers argue that regular upgrades drive innovation and economic growth, critics contend that the practice encourages a disposable culture, exacerbating e-waste and resource depletion. A recent study by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation suggests that extending the average lifespan of electronic devices by just one year could reduce carbon emissions by the equivalent of taking 2 million cars off the road annually. However, proponents of rapid technological cycles counter that such measures might stifle progress in energy-efficient designs, which often require newer hardware to function optimally. This tension highlights a fundamental conflict between economic imperatives and sustainability goals, prompting policymakers to consider legislative measures that mandate repairability and modular design, though implementation remains fraught with industry resistance and consumer apathy.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 급속한 기술 주기를 지지하는 사람들이 제시하는 핵심 주장은 무엇인가?
A. A. 그들은 기기 수명 연장이 소비자 선택권을 크게 해칠 것이라고 믿는다.
B. B. 그들은 에너지 효율적인 혁신을 달성하기 위해 더 새로운 하드웨어가 종종 필요하다고 주장한다.
C. C. 그들은 계획적 노후화가 환경에 부정적인 영향을 미치지 않는다고 주장한다.
D. D. 그들은 산업 자율 규제로 인해 입법적 조치가 불필요하다고 제안한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. They argue that newer hardware is often necessary for achieving energy-efficient innovations.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first