The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has long been a cornerstone of consumer electronics manufacturing, yet its environmental ramifications are increasingly under scrutiny. While manufacturers argue that regular upgrades drive innovation and economic growth, critics contend that the practice encourages a disposable culture, exacerbating e-waste and resource depletion. A recent study by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation suggests that extending the average lifespan of electronic devices by just one year could reduce carbon emissions by the equivalent of taking 2 million cars off the road annually. However, proponents of rapid technological cycles counter that such measures might stifle progress in energy-efficient designs, which often require newer hardware to function optimally. This tension highlights a fundamental conflict between economic imperatives and sustainability goals, prompting policymakers to consider legislative measures that mandate repairability and modular design, though implementation remains fraught with industry resistance and consumer apathy.
❓ 本文によると、急速な技術サイクルの支持者が挙げる重要な論点は何か。
A. A. 彼らは、デバイスの寿命を延ばすことが消費者の選択肢を著しく損なうと信じている。
B. B. 彼らは、エネルギー効率の高い革新を達成するためには、新しいハードウェアがしばしば必要であると主張している。
C. C. 彼らは、計画的陳腐化には環境への悪影響がないと主張している。
D. D. 彼らは、業界の自主規制により立法措置は不要であると示唆している。
✅ 正确答案
B. They argue that newer hardware is often necessary for achieving energy-efficient innovations.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first