The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has long been a cornerstone of consumer electronics manufacturing, yet its environmental ramifications are increasingly under scrutiny. While manufacturers argue that regular upgrades drive innovation and economic growth, critics contend that the practice encourages a disposable culture, exacerbating e-waste and resource depletion. A recent study by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation suggests that extending the average lifespan of electronic devices by just one year could reduce carbon emissions by the equivalent of taking 2 million cars off the road annually. However, proponents of rapid technological cycles counter that such measures might stifle progress in energy-efficient designs, which often require newer hardware to function optimally. This tension highlights a fundamental conflict between economic imperatives and sustainability goals, prompting policymakers to consider legislative measures that mandate repairability and modular design, though implementation remains fraught with industry resistance and consumer apathy.
❓ 根据文章内容,快速技术周期的支持者提出的一个关键论点是什么?
A. A. 他们认为延长设备使用寿命将严重损害消费者的选择权。
B. B. 他们认为,更新的硬件往往是实现节能创新的必要条件。
C. C. 他们声称计划性淘汰对环境没有负面影响。
D. D. 他们认为,由于行业自律的存在,立法措施并无必要。
✅ 正确答案
B. They argue that newer hardware is often necessary for achieving energy-efficient innovations.