The concept of 'environmental debt' has gained traction in ecological economics as a framework for quantifying the cumulative burden that human activities impose on natural systems. Unlike financial debt, which is typically settled through monetary repayment, environmental debt is characterized by irreversible degradation, such as biodiversity loss or soil depletion, that cannot be fully remediated. Researchers argue that this asymmetry arises because ecological thresholds are often crossed before the full consequences are understood, leading to nonlinear and potentially catastrophic shifts. Consequently, some economists advocate for integrating environmental debt into national accounting systems, proposing that gross domestic product should be adjusted to reflect the depletion of natural capital. However, critics contend that such adjustments are fraught with valuation challenges, as assigning monetary worth to ecosystem services remains inherently subjective. Nevertheless, the discourse underscores a growing recognition that economic growth, if pursued without ecological constraints, may ultimately undermine the very foundations it depends on.
❓ Theo đoạn văn, tại sao nợ môi trường được coi là khác biệt so với nợ tài chính?
A. Có thể được hoàn trả thông qua bồi thường bằng tiền.
B. Nó liên quan đến sự tổn hại thường không thể đảo ngược và vượt qua các ngưỡng sinh thái.
C. Nguyên nhân chủ yếu là do thiên tai chứ không phải do hành động của con người.
D. Nó không có tác động đến các chỉ số kinh tế quốc gia.
✅ 正确答案
It involves damage that is often irreversible and crosses ecological thresholds.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first