The concept of 'environmental debt' has gained traction in ecological economics as a framework for quantifying the cumulative burden that human activities impose on natural systems. Unlike financial debt, which is typically settled through monetary repayment, environmental debt is characterized by irreversible degradation, such as biodiversity loss or soil depletion, that cannot be fully remediated. Researchers argue that this asymmetry arises because ecological thresholds are often crossed before the full consequences are understood, leading to nonlinear and potentially catastrophic shifts. Consequently, some economists advocate for integrating environmental debt into national accounting systems, proposing that gross domestic product should be adjusted to reflect the depletion of natural capital. However, critics contend that such adjustments are fraught with valuation challenges, as assigning monetary worth to ecosystem services remains inherently subjective. Nevertheless, the discourse underscores a growing recognition that economic growth, if pursued without ecological constraints, may ultimately undermine the very foundations it depends on.
❓ 文章によると、環境負債が金融負債と異なると考えられるのはなぜか。
A. 金銭的な補償によって返済することができます。
B. これには、しばしば不可逆的であり、生態学的な閾値を超える損害が伴います。
C. 主に人為的な行動ではなく、自然災害によって引き起こされる。
D. 国家経済指標には影響を与えません。
✅ 正确答案
It involves damage that is often irreversible and crosses ecological thresholds.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first