The concept of 'environmental debt' has gained traction in ecological economics as a framework for quantifying the cumulative burden that human activities impose on natural systems. Unlike financial debt, which is typically settled through monetary repayment, environmental debt is characterized by irreversible degradation, such as biodiversity loss or soil depletion, that cannot be fully remediated. Researchers argue that this asymmetry arises because ecological thresholds are often crossed before the full consequences are understood, leading to nonlinear and potentially catastrophic shifts. Consequently, some economists advocate for integrating environmental debt into national accounting systems, proposing that gross domestic product should be adjusted to reflect the depletion of natural capital. However, critics contend that such adjustments are fraught with valuation challenges, as assigning monetary worth to ecosystem services remains inherently subjective. Nevertheless, the discourse underscores a growing recognition that economic growth, if pursued without ecological constraints, may ultimately undermine the very foundations it depends on.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 환경 부채가 재정 부채와 다른 이유는 무엇인가?
A. 금전적 보상을 통해 변제될 수 있습니다.
B. 이는 종종 되돌릴 수 없는 피해를 수반하며 생태적 임계점을 넘어서는 경우가 많습니다.
C. 이는 주로 인간의 행동보다는 자연 재해에 의해 발생합니다.
D. 국가 경제 지표에는 영향을 미치지 않습니다.
✅ 正确答案
It involves damage that is often irreversible and crosses ecological thresholds.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first