The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Unlike earlier epochs, which are distinguished by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is marked by stratigraphic signals such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Critics argue that human effects are diachronous, meaning they appear at different times across the globe, which violates the synchronous boundaries required for a formal geological unit. Proponents counter that the mid-20th century 'Great Acceleration' provides a globally consistent marker, albeit one tied to industrial development. This debate highlights a fundamental tension: whether geological classification should prioritize measurable physical markers or reflect broader societal narratives about humanity's role in shaping the planet.
❓ 本文によると、一部の地質学者が人新世の公式な認定に反対する主な理由は何か。
A. 人間の影響は、地質層を変えるほど顕著ではない。
B. 提案されたマーカーは、その出現において世界的に同時的ではない。
C. この時代の開始日は地質学者が研究するにはあまりにも最近すぎる。
D. 放射性同位体とプラスチックは信頼できる指標とは見なされていません。
✅ 正确答案
The proposed markers are not globally simultaneous in their appearance.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first