The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human influence across different regions and time periods. They suggest that focusing solely on a global chronological boundary may obscure the varied trajectories of environmental change in different societies. Moreover, the formal recognition of the Anthropocene carries profound implications for policy-making, as it frames humanity as a collective geological force, potentially shifting responsibility and prompting more unified environmental action. Despite ongoing debates, the term has become a powerful metaphor for the urgency of addressing climate change.
❓ この文章で言及されている意見の相違の主な点は何ですか?
A. A) 人間の環境への影響が、測定できるほど顕著であるかどうか。
B. B) 人新世を正式な地質時代として考慮すべきかどうか。
C. C) 人新世という概念が、人間の影響の複雑さを十分に捉えているかどうか。
D. D) プラスチック汚染と核の放射性降下物が、人間の活動の信頼できる指標であるかどうか。
✅ 正确答案
C) Whether the Anthropocene concept adequately captures the complexity of human influence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first