The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human influence across different regions and time periods. They suggest that focusing solely on a global chronological boundary may obscure the varied trajectories of environmental change in different societies. Moreover, the formal recognition of the Anthropocene carries profound implications for policy-making, as it frames humanity as a collective geological force, potentially shifting responsibility and prompting more unified environmental action. Despite ongoing debates, the term has become a powerful metaphor for the urgency of addressing climate change.
❓ 본문에서 언급된 의견 차이의 핵심은 무엇인가?
A. A) 인간의 환경 영향이 측정될 만큼 충분히 중요한지 여부.
B. B) 인류세(Anthropocene)가 공식적인 지질 시대(epoch)로 간주되어야 하는지 여부.
C. C) 인류세 개념이 인간 영향의 복잡성을 충분히 포착하는지 여부.
D. D) 플라스틱 오염과 핵 낙진이 인간 활동의 신뢰할 수 있는 지표인지 여부.
✅ 正确答案
C) Whether the Anthropocene concept adequately captures the complexity of human influence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first