The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human influence across different regions and time periods. They suggest that focusing solely on a global chronological boundary may obscure the varied trajectories of environmental change in different societies. Moreover, the formal recognition of the Anthropocene carries profound implications for policy-making, as it frames humanity as a collective geological force, potentially shifting responsibility and prompting more unified environmental action. Despite ongoing debates, the term has become a powerful metaphor for the urgency of addressing climate change.
❓ Какова основная точка разногласий, упомянутая в отрывке?
A. A) Достаточно ли значимо воздействие человека на окружающую среду, чтобы его можно было измерить.
B. B) Следует ли считать антропоцен формальной геологической эпохой.
C. C) Достаточно ли адекватно концепция антропоцена отражает сложность человеческого влияния.
D. D) Являются ли пластиковое загрязнение и радиоактивные осадки надёжными индикаторами деятельности человека.
✅ 正确答案
C) Whether the Anthropocene concept adequately captures the complexity of human influence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first