The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has long been a cornerstone of consumer electronics manufacturing, yet its environmental implications are increasingly under scrutiny. This strategy, whereby products are intentionally designed with a limited lifespan to encourage repeat purchases, contributes significantly to electronic waste. Recent studies suggest that while consumers benefit from lower upfront costs and access to newer technology, the long-term ecological cost is substantial. Manufacturers argue that planned obsolescence drives innovation and economic growth, but critics contend that it fosters a 'throwaway culture' that depletes natural resources and exacerbates pollution. A proposed solution involves shifting towards a circular economy model, where products are designed for durability, repairability, and eventual recycling. However, implementing such a model requires not only corporate policy changes but also a fundamental shift in consumer behavior and regulatory frameworks. The debate remains polarized, balancing economic pragmatism against environmental stewardship.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная критика запланированного устаревания?
A. Это приводит к более высоким первоначальным затратам для потребителей.
B. Это препятствует технологическим инновациям.
C. Это способствует деградации окружающей среды из-за увеличения количества отходов.
D. Это снижает доступность новых технологий.
✅ 正确答案
It contributes to environmental degradation through increased waste.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first