The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has long been a cornerstone of consumer electronics manufacturing, yet its environmental implications are increasingly under scrutiny. This strategy, whereby products are intentionally designed with a limited lifespan to encourage repeat purchases, contributes significantly to electronic waste. Recent studies suggest that while consumers benefit from lower upfront costs and access to newer technology, the long-term ecological cost is substantial. Manufacturers argue that planned obsolescence drives innovation and economic growth, but critics contend that it fosters a 'throwaway culture' that depletes natural resources and exacerbates pollution. A proposed solution involves shifting towards a circular economy model, where products are designed for durability, repairability, and eventual recycling. However, implementing such a model requires not only corporate policy changes but also a fundamental shift in consumer behavior and regulatory frameworks. The debate remains polarized, balancing economic pragmatism against environmental stewardship.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 계획적 노후화에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 이는 소비자에게 더 높은 초기 비용을 초래합니다.
B. 기술 혁신을 저해한다.
C. 이는 증가된 폐기물을 통해 환경 악화에 기여합니다.
D. 이는 최신 기술의 가용성을 감소시킵니다.
✅ 正确答案
It contributes to environmental degradation through increased waste.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first