The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the 1980s, driven by evidence that marginalized communities disproportionately bear the burden of pollution and hazardous waste. Scholars argue that this disparity is not accidental but results from systemic inequalities in land-use planning and regulatory enforcement. For instance, studies in the United States have shown that toxic facilities are more likely to be sited in low-income neighborhoods and areas inhabited by ethnic minorities. This pattern persists despite decades of environmental legislation, suggesting that procedural mechanisms alone are insufficient. To address this, advocates propose integrating equity assessments into policy-making and ensuring meaningful public participation from affected groups. Such reforms aim not merely to redistribute risks but to transform the underlying power structures that perpetuate environmental harm.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 소외된 지역사회가 기존 법안에도 불구하고 계속해서 불균형적인 환경 부담을 겪는 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A) 환경법이 의도적으로 이러한 지역사회에 불리하게 편향되어 있기 때문이다.
B. B) 절차적 메커니즘만으로는 의사결정 과정의 체계적 불평등을 시정할 수 없기 때문이다.
C. C) 이러한 지역사회는 오염을 해결할 기술적 전문성이 부족하기 때문이다.
D. D) 위험 시설은 저소득 지역 인근에 위치할 때 더 수익성이 높기 때문이다.
✅ 正确答案
B) Because procedural mechanisms alone cannot rectify systemic inequalities in decision-making.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first