The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the 1980s, driven by evidence that marginalized communities disproportionately bear the burden of pollution and hazardous waste. Scholars argue that this disparity is not accidental but results from systemic inequalities in land-use planning and regulatory enforcement. For instance, studies in the United States have shown that toxic facilities are more likely to be sited in low-income neighborhoods and areas inhabited by ethnic minorities. This pattern persists despite decades of environmental legislation, suggesting that procedural mechanisms alone are insufficient. To address this, advocates propose integrating equity assessments into policy-making and ensuring meaningful public participation from affected groups. Such reforms aim not merely to redistribute risks but to transform the underlying power structures that perpetuate environmental harm.
❓ 根据文章所述,为什么边缘化社区尽管已有相关立法,却仍持续面临不成比例的环境负担?
A. A) 因为环境法律有意对这些社区存在偏见。
B. B) 因为仅靠程序性机制无法纠正决策中的系统性不平等。
C. C) 因为这些社区缺乏解决污染问题的技术专业知识。
D. D)因为危险设施位于低收入地区附近时更有利可图。
✅ 正确答案
B) Because procedural mechanisms alone cannot rectify systemic inequalities in decision-making.