The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding cross-cultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills within a familiar context, CQ specifically addresses the capability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Researchers identify four distinct dimensions: metacognitive CQ (the conscious awareness and regulation of cultural assumptions during interactions), cognitive CQ (knowledge of norms, practices, and conventions in different cultures), motivational CQ (the drive and interest to adapt to new cultural environments), and behavioral CQ (the ability to exhibit appropriate verbal and nonverbal actions when interacting with people from other cultures). Studies suggest that high CQ correlates with better job performance in multicultural teams, reduced conflict, and increased innovation. However, critics argue that CQ measurement often relies on self-reports, which may be biased, and that the construct overlaps significantly with general adaptability and openness to experience, questioning its discriminant validity.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 다음 중 문화적 지능 연구의 주요 한계를 가장 잘 설명하는 것은 무엇인가?
A. A) 이는 문화 간 상황에서 감성 지능의 역할을 무시한다.
B. B) 자체 평가에 의존하기 때문에 측정 도구가 편향된 결과를 초래할 수 있다.
C. C) 행동적 측면을 지나치게 강조하면서 인지적 지식을 소홀히 한다.
D. D) 이는 조직적 맥락에만 적용되며, 더 넓은 사회적 상호작용에는 적용되지 않는다.
✅ 正确答案
B) Its measurement tools may produce biased results due to reliance on self-assessment.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first