The concept of 'environmental migration' has gained significant traction in recent decades, yet its definition remains contested. While some scholars argue that environmental factors are rarely the sole cause of displacement, instead acting as a 'threat multiplier' that exacerbates existing social, economic, and political vulnerabilities, others contend that acute events such as floods or droughts can directly trigger mass movement. A key challenge lies in distinguishing between voluntary migration driven by economic opportunity and forced displacement resulting from environmental degradation. Moreover, the term 'climate refugee' is legally imprecise, as the 1951 Refugee Convention does not recognize environmental factors as grounds for asylum. This ambiguity complicates policy responses, leading to calls for a more nuanced framework that acknowledges the complex interplay of drivers behind human mobility.
❓ Согласно тексту, почему термин «климатический беженец» считается юридически неточным?
A. A. Потому что экологические мигранты не пересекают международные границы.
B. B. Поскольку Конвенция о статусе беженцев 1951 года не включает экологические причины в качестве основания для статуса беженца.
C. C. Потому что изменение климата не имеет научных доказательств влияния на миграционные паттерны.
D. D. Потому что большинство экологических миграций являются добровольными и экономически мотивированными.
✅ 正确答案
B. Because the 1951 Refugee Convention does not include environmental reasons as a basis for refugee status.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first