The concept of 'environmental migration' has gained significant traction in recent decades, yet its definition remains contested. While some scholars argue that environmental factors are rarely the sole cause of displacement, instead acting as a 'threat multiplier' that exacerbates existing social, economic, and political vulnerabilities, others contend that acute events such as floods or droughts can directly trigger mass movement. A key challenge lies in distinguishing between voluntary migration driven by economic opportunity and forced displacement resulting from environmental degradation. Moreover, the term 'climate refugee' is legally imprecise, as the 1951 Refugee Convention does not recognize environmental factors as grounds for asylum. This ambiguity complicates policy responses, leading to calls for a more nuanced framework that acknowledges the complex interplay of drivers behind human mobility.
❓ 본문에 따르면, '기후 난민'이라는 용어가 법적으로 부정확하다고 간주되는 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 환경 이주민들은 국제 국경을 넘지 않기 때문이다.
B. B. 1951년 난민 협약은 환경적 이유를 난민 지위의 근거로 포함하지 않기 때문이다.
C. C. 기후 변화가 이주 패턴에 영향을 미친다는 것이 과학적으로 입증되지 않았기 때문이다.
D. D. 대부분의 환경적 이주는 자발적이고 경제적 동기에 의한 것이기 때문이다.
✅ 正确答案
B. Because the 1951 Refugee Convention does not include environmental reasons as a basis for refugee status.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first