The concept of 'environmental migration' has gained significant traction in recent decades, yet its definition remains contested. While some scholars argue that environmental factors are rarely the sole cause of displacement, instead acting as a 'threat multiplier' that exacerbates existing social, economic, and political vulnerabilities, others contend that acute events such as floods or droughts can directly trigger mass movement. A key challenge lies in distinguishing between voluntary migration driven by economic opportunity and forced displacement resulting from environmental degradation. Moreover, the term 'climate refugee' is legally imprecise, as the 1951 Refugee Convention does not recognize environmental factors as grounds for asylum. This ambiguity complicates policy responses, leading to calls for a more nuanced framework that acknowledges the complex interplay of drivers behind human mobility.
❓ 本文によると、「気候難民」という用語が法的に不正確とされるのはなぜか。
A. A. 環境移民は国際的な国境を越えないからである。
B. B. 1951年の難民条約は、環境上の理由を難民認定の根拠として含んでいないからである。
C. C. 気候変動が移住パターンに影響を与えることは科学的に証明されていないから。
D. D. なぜなら、ほとんどの環境移住は自発的であり、経済的な動機に基づいているからである。
✅ 正确答案
B. Because the 1951 Refugee Convention does not include environmental reasons as a basis for refugee status.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first