The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early proponents argued that human behavior and societal development were largely shaped by climatic conditions and geographical features. However, this perspective was criticized for oversimplifying complex human-environment interactions and for justifying colonialism. Modern scholarship, such as the work of Jared Diamond, has revived interest in the role of geography, but with more nuanced approaches. Diamond suggests that environmental factors, such as the availability of domesticable plants and animals, influenced the pace of technological innovation and societal complexity. Yet he emphasizes that these factors do not dictate outcomes; rather, they create opportunities and constraints that interact with cultural and historical contingencies. Thus, contemporary environmental determinism is less about causation and more about understanding the probabilistic influences of the physical environment on human societies.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 현대 학문은 초기 환경 결정론과 어떻게 다른가?
A. 그것은 인간 사회에 대한 지리의 영향력을 완전히 부정한다.
B. 그것은 환경적 요인을 사회적 결과의 결정적 원인으로 본다.
C. 환경적 요인을 절대적 결정 요인이 아닌 확률적 영향으로 간주한다.
D. 그것은 지리적 요소를 무시하면서 문화적 요소에만 초점을 맞춘다.
✅ 正确答案
It considers environmental factors as probabilistic influences rather than absolute determinants.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first