The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early proponents argued that human behavior and societal development were largely shaped by climatic conditions and geographical features. However, this perspective was criticized for oversimplifying complex human-environment interactions and for justifying colonialism. Modern scholarship, such as the work of Jared Diamond, has revived interest in the role of geography, but with more nuanced approaches. Diamond suggests that environmental factors, such as the availability of domesticable plants and animals, influenced the pace of technological innovation and societal complexity. Yet he emphasizes that these factors do not dictate outcomes; rather, they create opportunities and constraints that interact with cultural and historical contingencies. Thus, contemporary environmental determinism is less about causation and more about understanding the probabilistic influences of the physical environment on human societies.
❓ According to the passage, how does modern scholarship differ from early environmental determinism?
A. It completely rejects any influence of geography on human societies.
B. It views environmental factors as deterministic causes of societal outcomes.
C. It considers environmental factors as probabilistic influences rather than absolute determinants.
D. It focuses solely on cultural factors while ignoring geographical ones.
✅ 正确答案
It considers environmental factors as probabilistic influences rather than absolute determinants.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first