The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early proponents argued that human behavior and societal development were largely shaped by climatic conditions and geographical features. However, this perspective was criticized for oversimplifying complex human-environment interactions and for justifying colonialism. Modern scholarship, such as the work of Jared Diamond, has revived interest in the role of geography, but with more nuanced approaches. Diamond suggests that environmental factors, such as the availability of domesticable plants and animals, influenced the pace of technological innovation and societal complexity. Yet he emphasizes that these factors do not dictate outcomes; rather, they create opportunities and constraints that interact with cultural and historical contingencies. Thus, contemporary environmental determinism is less about causation and more about understanding the probabilistic influences of the physical environment on human societies.
❓ 本文によると、現代の学術研究は初期の環境決定論とどのように異なるのでしょうか?
A. それは、地理が人間社会に与える影響を完全に否定するものである。
B. それは環境要因を社会的结果の決定的原因と見なす。
C. 環境要因を絶対的な決定要因ではなく、確率的な影響として捉えている。
D. それは地理的要因を無視して、文化的要因のみに焦点を当てている。
✅ 正确答案
It considers environmental factors as probabilistic influences rather than absolute determinants.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first