The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex environmental changes and that the proposed markers may not be globally synchronous, a fundamental requirement for a formal geological boundary. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and the need to address contemporary environmental crises, raising questions about how we define and respond to human-induced planetary change.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная критика антропоцена как формальной геологической эпохи?
A. A. Он слишком много внимания уделяет радиоактивным осадкам и загрязнению пластиком.
B. B. Предложенные маркеры могут не быть глобально синхронными.
C. C. Это игнорирует роль углекислого газа в изменении климата.
D. D. У нее нет научной поддержки со стороны геологов.
✅ 正确答案
B. Its proposed markers may not be globally synchronous.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first