The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex environmental changes and that the proposed markers may not be globally synchronous, a fundamental requirement for a formal geological boundary. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and the need to address contemporary environmental crises, raising questions about how we define and respond to human-induced planetary change.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 인류세를 공식적인 지질 시대(epoch)로 규정하는 것에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 핵 낙진과 플라스틱 오염에 너무 집중하고 있다.
B. B. 제안된 지표들이 전 지구적으로 동시적이지 않을 수 있다.
C. C. 그것은 기후 변화에서 이산화탄소의 역할을 무시한다.
D. D. 지질학자들로부터 과학적 지지를 받지 못한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. Its proposed markers may not be globally synchronous.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first