The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex environmental changes and that the proposed markers may not be globally synchronous, a fundamental requirement for a formal geological boundary. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and the need to address contemporary environmental crises, raising questions about how we define and respond to human-induced planetary change.
❓ この文章によると、人新世を正式な地質時代として扱うことに対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. A. 核降下物とプラスチック汚染に焦点を当てすぎている。
B. B. 提案されたマーカーは、世界的に同時期のものではない可能性がある。
C. C. それは気候変動における二酸化炭素の役割を無視している。
D. D. 地質学者からの科学的裏付けはない。
✅ 正确答案
B. Its proposed markers may not be globally synchronous.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first